CHAPTER 2
ESSENTIAL REQUISITES OF CONTRACTS
GENERAL PROVISIONS
Art. 1318. There is no contract unless
the following requisites concur:
(1) Consent of the contracting parties;
(2) Object certain which is the subject
matter of the contract;
(3) Cause of the obligation which is
established. (1261)
SECTION 1. - Consent
Art. 1319. Consent is manifested by the
meeting of the offer and the acceptance upon the thing and the cause
which are to constitute the contract. The offer must be certain and
the acceptance absolute. A qualified acceptance constitutes a
counter-offer.
Acceptance made by letter or telegram
does not bind the offerer except from the time it came to his
knowledge. The contract, in such a case, is presumed to have been
entered into in the place where the offer was made. (1262a)
Art. 1320. An acceptance may be express
or implied. (n)
Art. 1321. The person making the offer
may fix the time, place, and manner of acceptance, all of which must
be complied with. (n)
Art. 1322. An offer made through an
agent is accepted from the time acceptance is communicated to him.
(n)
Art. 1323. An offer becomes ineffective
upon the death, civil interdiction, insanity, or insolvency of either
party before acceptance is conveyed. (n)
Art. 1324. When the offerer has allowed
the offeree a certain period to accept, the offer may be withdrawn at
any time before acceptance by communicating such withdrawal, except
when the option is founded upon a consideration, as something paid or
promised. (n)
Art. 1325. Unless it appears otherwise,
business advertisements of things for sale are not definite offers,
but mere invitations to make an offer. (n)
Art. 1326. Advertisements for bidders
are simply invitations to make proposals, and the advertiser is not
bound to accept the highest or lowest bidder, unless the contrary
appears. (n)
Art. 1327. The following cannot give
consent to a contract:
(1) Unemancipated minors;
(2) Insane or demented persons, and
deaf-mutes who do not know how to write. (1263a)
Art. 1328. Contracts entered into
during a lucid interval are valid. Contracts agreed to in a state of
drunkenness or during a hypnotic spell are voidable. (n)
Art. 1329. The incapacity declared in
Article 1327 is subject to the modifications determined by law, and
is understood to be without prejudice to special disqualifications
established in the laws. (1264)
Art. 1330. A contract where consent is
given through mistake, violence, intimidation, undue influence, or
fraud is voidable. (1265a)
Art. 1331. In order that mistake may
invalidate consent, it should refer to the substance of the thing
which is the object of the contract, or to those conditions which
have principally moved one or both parties to enter into the
contract.
Mistake as to the identity or
qualifications of one of the parties will vitiate consent only when
such identity or qualifications have been the principal cause of the
contract.
A simple mistake of account shall give
rise to its correction. (1266a)
Art. 1332. When one of the parties is
unable to read, or if the contract is in a language not understood by
him, and mistake or fraud is alleged, the person enforcing the
contract must show that the terms thereof have been fully explained
to the former. (n)
Art. 1333. There is no mistake if the
party alleging it knew the doubt, contingency or risk affecting the
object of the contract. (n)
Art. 1334. Mutual error as to the legal
effect of an agreement when the real purpose of the parties is
frustrated, may vitiate consent. (n)
Art. 1335. There is violence when in
order to wrest consent, serious or irresistible force is employed.
There is intimidation when one of the
contracting parties is compelled by a reasonable and well-grounded
fear of an imminent and grave evil upon his person or property, or
upon the person or property of his spouse, descendants or ascendants,
to give his consent.
To determine the degree of
intimidation, the age, sex and condition of the person shall be borne
in mind.
A threat to enforce one's claim through
competent authority, if the claim is just or legal, does not vitiate
consent. (1267a)
Art. 1336. Violence or intimidation
shall annul the obligation, although it may have been employed by a
third person who did not take part in the contract. (1268)
Art. 1337. There is undue influence
when a person takes improper advantage of his power over the will of
another, depriving the latter of a reasonable freedom of choice. The
following circumstances shall be considered: the confidential,
family, spiritual and other relations between the parties, or the
fact that the person alleged to have been unduly influenced was
suffering from mental weakness, or was ignorant or in financial
distress. (n)
Art. 1338. There is fraud when, through
insidious words or machinations of one of the contracting parties,
the other is induced to enter into a contract which, without them, he
would not have agreed to. (1269)
Art. 1339. Failure to disclose facts,
when there is a duty to reveal them, as when the parties are bound by
confidential relations, constitutes fraud. (n)
Art. 1340. The usual exaggerations in
trade, when the other party had an opportunity to know the facts, are
not in themselves fraudulent. (n)
Art. 1341. A mere expression of an
opinion does not signify fraud, unless made by an expert and the
other party has relied on the former's special knowledge. (n)
Art. 1342. Misrepresentation by a third
person does not vitiate consent, unless such misrepresentation has
created substantial mistake and the same is mutual. (n)
Art. 1343. Misrepresentation made in
good faith is not fraudulent but may constitute error. (n)
Art. 1344. In order that fraud may make
a contract voidable, it should be serious and should not have been
employed by both contracting parties.
Incidental fraud only obliges the
person employing it to pay damages. (1270)
Art. 1345. Simulation of a contract may
be absolute or relative. The former takes place when the parties do
not intend to be bound at all; the latter, when the parties conceal
their true agreement. (n)
Art. 1346. An absolutely simulated or
fictitious contract is void. A relative simulation, when it does not
prejudice a third person and is not intended for any purpose contrary
to law, morals, good customs, public order or public policy binds the
parties to their real agreement. (n)
SECTION 2. - Object of Contracts
Art. 1347. All things which are not
outside the commerce of men, including future things, may be the
object of a contract. All rights which are not intransmissible may
also be the object of contracts.
No contract may be entered into upon
future inheritance except in cases expressly authorized by law.
All services which are not contrary to
law, morals, good customs, public order or public policy may likewise
be the object of a contract. (1271a)
Art. 1348. Impossible things or
services cannot be the object of contracts. (1272)
Art. 1349. The object of every contract
must be determinate as to its kind. The fact that the quantity is not
determinate shall not be an obstacle to the existence of the
contract, provided it is possible to determine the same, without the
need of a new contract between the parties. (1273)
SECTION 3. - Cause of Contracts
Art. 1350. In onerous contracts the
cause is understood to be, for each contracting party, the prestation
or promise of a thing or service by the other; in remuneratory ones,
the service or benefit which is remunerated; and in contracts of pure
beneficence, the mere liberality of the benefactor. (1274)
Art. 1351. The particular motives of
the parties in entering into a contract are different from the cause
thereof. (n)
Art. 1352. Contracts without cause, or
with unlawful cause, produce no effect whatever. The cause is
unlawful if it is contrary to law, morals, good customs, public order
or public policy. (1275a)
Art. 1353. The statement of a false
cause in contracts shall render them void, if it should not be proved
that they were founded upon another cause which is true and lawful.
(1276)
Art. 1354. Although the cause is not
stated in the contract, it is presumed that it exists and is lawful,
unless the debtor proves the contrary. (1277)
Art. 1355. Except in cases specified by
law, lesion or inadequacy of cause shall not invalidate a contract,
unless there has been fraud, mistake or undue influence. (n)
No comments:
Post a Comment